CAP Package Review and the Authorization to Connect Decision
Upon receipt of the CAP package, the CAO reviews the contents for completeness. In the event an incomplete package is received by the CAO, the package will be rejected and no CAO tracking number assigned. The partner will receive notification of a rejected package to include what documentation is missing from the package. Typically, when all the connection approval requirements are met an ATC or IATC will be issued within eight (8) business days.
As an integral part of the process, the CAO assesses the level of risk the partner's IS or network enclave poses to the specific DISN network/service and to the GIG community at large. The identification of IA vulnerabilities or other non-compliance issues and the responsiveness of the affected enclave in implementing appropriate remediation or mitigation measures against validated vulnerabilities will have a direct impact on the risk assessment, and subsequently on the connection approval decision.
The following are some of the indicators that would contribute to the assessment of an elevated risk:
- Missing, incomplete, or inaccurate CAP package input (because unknowns lead to a lower level of confidence in the IA status of the partner IS/enclave).
- Unsatisfactory results during remote compliance monitoring/vulnerability assessment where policy compliance is reviewed.
If the risk is "low" or "medium," the CAO will issue an ATC or IATC. A "medium" risk assessment will cause the CAO to monitor more closely the IA status of the IS/enclave during the connection life cycle. "Low" risk assessments will not affect a new connection request.
An ATC/IATC will normally authorize the partner to connect to the DISN network/service defined in the connection approval, up to the accreditation decision ATD. The results of the risk assessment may warrant the issuance of a connection approval decision with a validity period shorter than that of the accreditation decision ATD. In such cases, the CAO will provide justification to the DAA for the shorter validity period.
If the CAO assesses a "high" risk, it will provide the DAA the justification for the assessment and inform the DAA that current guidance (i.e., policy, DSAWG decision, STIGs, etc.) from DISN/GIG DAAs precludes the issuance of an ATC without additional review of the IS/enclave IA status by the community accreditation bodies.