CAO Review of the CAP Package and the Authorization to Connect Decision
Upon submittal of the registration, the CAO will review all sections of the registration or completeness and compliance. In the event a section is incomplete or a non-compliant artifact is uploaded to the database, that individual section will be rejected. The POC’s listed in the database will receive notification of a rejected registration to include what documentation is missing or non-compliant from the package. The partner must log back into the database and complete or upload the updated artifact for the rejected section. Typically, when all the connection approval requirements are met an ATC or IATC will be issued within eight (8) business days.
As an integral part of the process, the CAO assesses the level of risk the partner’s IS or network enclave poses to the specific DISN network/service and to the GIG community at large. The identification of IA vulnerabilities or other non-compliance issues and the responsiveness of the affected enclave in implementing appropriate remediation or mitigation measures against validated vulnerabilities will have a direct impact on the risk assessment, and subsequently on the connection approval decision.
The following are some of the indicators that would contribute to the assessment of an elevated risk:
- Missing, incomplete, or inaccurate CAP package input (because unknowns lead to a lower level of confidence in the IA status of the partner IS/enclave).
- Unsatisfactory results during an on-site or remote compliance monitoring/vulnerability assessment event where IA controls are tested and policy compliance is reviewed
If the risk is "low" or “medium," the CAO will issue an ATC or IATC. A "medium" risk assessment will cause the CAO to more closely monitor the IA status of the IS/enclave during the connection life cycle. "Low" risk assessments will not affect a new connection request.
An ATC/IATC will normally authorize the partner to connect to the DISN network/service defined in the connection approval, up to the accreditation decision ATD. The results of the risk assessment may warrant the issuance of a connection approval decision with a validity period shorter than that of the accreditation decision ATD. In such cases, the CAO will provide justification to the DAA for the shorter validity period.
If the CAO assesses a "high" risk, it will provide the DAA the justification for the assessment and inform the DAA that current guidance (i.e., policy, DSAWG decision, STIGs, etc.) from DISN/GIG DAAs precludes the issuance of an ATC without additional review of the IS/enclave IA status by the community accreditation bodies.